Non-invasive prenatal testing in Germany and Israel: a matter of course or a matter of discourse?
- This chapter compares Germany and Israel, that reached different decisions regarding noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) implementation, and describes the associated debates and stakeholders' involvement in both. The Israeli decision-making provoked hardly any public discourse, whereas in Germany it triggered extensive debate involving a broad range of stakeholders. Although the German legal and regulatory framework is more restrictive, and despite diverse opposition, the process led to public coverage of NIPT. Yet, despite a permissive framework, it was rejected in Israel. However, opposing explicit agendas underlie this: Israel aims to prevent disability, and Germany to minimize invasive testing and its associated risks.
Author: | Tamar Nov-KlaimanORCiDGND, Hannes Foth, Yael Hashiloni-Dolev |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1127477 |
Frontdoor URL | https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/112747 |
ISBN: | 9783837659887OPAC |
ISBN: | 9783839459881OPAC |
ISSN: | 2702-8267OPAC |
ISSN: | 2702-8275OPAC |
Parent Title (English): | Genetic responsibility in Germany and Israel: practices of prenatal diagnosis |
Publisher: | transcript |
Place of publication: | Bielefeld |
Editor: | Christina Schües |
Type: | Part of a Book |
Language: | English |
Year of first Publication: | 2022 |
Publishing Institution: | Universität Augsburg |
Release Date: | 2024/04/30 |
First Page: | 93 |
Last Page: | 120 |
Series: | Bioethik / Medizinethik ; 4 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839459881-005 |
Institutes: | Medizinische Fakultät |
Medizinische Fakultät / Professur für Ethik der Medizin | |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | 6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit |
Licence (German): | CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand) |